Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:02:58 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, cem@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> Subject: Re: pkg does not recognize correct kernel version Message-ID: <20180301120257.GB3194@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <1796463.2W2Te48fqL@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <op.zeo60hflkndu52@klop.ws> <20287587.l4BUZnE1AB@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20180228194547.GA7123@kib.kiev.ua> <1796463.2W2Te48fqL@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:32:43PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 09:45:47 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:57:53AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:19:02 AM Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 22:05:51 +0100, Konstantin Belousov > > > > > <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Look at the man page. pkg reads version from the /bin/sh ELF FreeBSD > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which man page? I can't find it in pkg help update or pkg help upgrade or > > > > > man pkg. > > > > > > > > I had to dig for quite a while to find a reference (pkg.conf(5)): > > > > > > > > ABI: string The ABI of the package you want to install. Default: > > > > derived from the ABI of the /bin/sh binary. > > > > > > > > >> version note: > > > > >> orion% file /bin/ls > > > > >> /bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), > > > > >> dynamically linked, interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, for FreeBSD 11.1 > > > > >> (1101506), FreeBSD-style, stripped > > > > >> > > > > >> Update world past the __FreeBSD_version which is reported for the > > > > >> repository. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean I always have to do a *clean* buildworld after every version > > > > > bump? This takes ages. > > > > > > > > You could also do a -DNO_CLEAN buildworld. > > > > > > > > Or you can continue to override with "-o OSVERSION=foo", although that > > > > may eventually result in broken packages. In general the OSVERSION is > > > > bumped conservatively (more often than will actually result in > > > > breakage), so you can get away with the easy workaround for a while > > > > between buildworlds. > > > > > > NO_CLEAN=yes doesn't work. A clean buildworld is required. The reason is that > > > the __FreeBSD_version embedded in binaries is stored in /usr/lib/crt*.o, but > > > that the dependency rules in lib/csu/Makefile do not rebuild these .o files > > > everytime <sys/param.h> changes (so a NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld won't rebuild them > > > leaving them with a stale version). Furthermore, when binaries and shared > > > libraries are built, our Makefiles do not specify that the relevant > > > /usr/lib/crt*.o files are dependencies, so even if we fixed the missing > > > <sys/param.h> dependency, no binaries would relink to pick up the updated > > > __FreeBSD_version file unless some other input to the binary changed. This > > > one could perhaps be mostly mitigated by forcing libc to depend on the > > > relevant crt*.o files explicitly (or even having it depend on <sys/param.h> > > > to force relinking of everything when <sys/param.h> changes). > > libc already depends on sys/param.h. > > Hmm, even when I removed /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu entirely and then did a buildworld > NO_CLEAN=yes recently /bin/sh was not relinked, though perhaps at that point > libc already thought it was up-to-date relative to <sys/param.h> from the previous > build. > > > I think it would be enough to specify that crt1.o depends on sys/param.h > > as well. Although it is also strange, because e.g. for amd64 the dep > > thread is csu/amd64/crt1.c->csu/common/crtbrand.c->sys/param.h, which should > > be detected by the include file calculation. > > I think the detour via assembly + sed is what breaks the dependency chain. > FWIW, I found that on at least MIPS with clang I did not need the SED_FIX_NOTE > hack. Perhaps the FIX_NOTE should be re-evaluated for all the changes happen in the toolchains since the hack was needed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180301120257.GB3194>