Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:31:22 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Alex de Joode <a.dejoode@leaseweb.com>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available... Message-ID: <201210191731.22668.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <17ECE3EA4CEBE34A910A8B067A4DABA71B9B3C@nlhlmexdb03.ocom.lan> References: <17ECE3EA4CEBE34A910A8B067A4DABA71B771C@nlhlmexdb03.ocom.lan> <508155E4.3040602@FreeBSD.org> <17ECE3EA4CEBE34A910A8B067A4DABA71B9B3C@nlhlmexdb03.ocom.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, October 19, 2012 2:26:45 pm Alex de Joode wrote: > https://sabotage.org/FBSD/FBSD-9.1RC2.jpg > > Screen shot. Basicly the only diff between the two r210 are the disks, > one has 2x2TB (works) and the one that has 2x1Tb fails with the above error. > > Both are sw/ mirrored. No hw/ raid and ACHI sata settings. Hummm, somehow we are executing data, not code: 00000000 8c 39 00 00 01 82 44 45 4c 4c 20 20 50 45 5f 53 |.9....DELL PE_S| That isn't a valid instruction. :( Also, your eip value is not anything that would be normal. Actually, your eip value looks like a pointer into the BIOS (0xf000:bf6a). I bet something in your BIOS had a buffer overrun and trashed the stack or some such. Or it overran an I/O buffer which trashed the return stack of the userland process somehow. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201210191731.22668.jhb>