Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Feb 95 00:01:14 -0800
From:      hasty@netcom.com
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr), jkh@morton.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, hasty@netcom.com
Subject:   Re: playmidi? 
Message-ID:  <199502140801.AAA19465@netcom20.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 13 Feb 95 23:15:09 -0800. <1934.792746109@time.cdrom.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Just take down adagio from a good branch on net . 
> > Try to shake adagio a bit like make then issue the magic
> > incatation xpm.

> I'll try and make a port of this, thanks.

> > Try to download:
> >  ftp.iuma.com://audio_utils/mpeg_players/Workstations/maplay1_2.tar.Z

> And this.  It's pretty straight-forward.

> > BTW: We can do everything that the linux crowd can with sound
> > plus we got vat !

> I'm not altogether sure of this!  We still don't seem to support midi
> on the awe32, nor do we handle wave-table cards very well.  I don't
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Excuse me, I do polish every day  my GUSes and I do make sure that
they get plenty of oil so they can rumble :)

> think we support the turtle beach or waveblaster features at all!

> If I sent you one of every sound card we wanted support for, would
> you consider making them all work with -current?  You're the expert! :-)



Okay,

Sorry, I am happy with my GUS and the real purpose that I am doing all
this sound stuff right now is to at least bring the sound apps to 
pre 2.0 working status. 



nas (network audio) seems to be very broken over here however
I think is just the mods that were done to nas so hopefully
I can bring back to life soon nas now that I have a working sound
driver.

Any news from anyone on my recent vat upload?

I may have a vat replacement which we can hack our brains out with.
(the sources for vat are not available yet)
Is called nevot and is a good starting point. My complaint 
is that I consider Nevot hostile to port. After porting apps
for a little while you get a feel for which ones are the tough
ones or (poorly written) and the ones that are a breeze to port.
At any rate, I am making great progress with Nevot.

	Cheers,
	Amancio






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502140801.AAA19465>