Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Jan 1995 17:42:34 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, j@uriah.sax.de
Subject:   Re: Never mind on the "mcopy busy" 
Message-ID:  <1660.789270154@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jan 95 07:56:32 %2B1100." <199501042056.HAA04453@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I've noticed that FreeBSD 2's flock() is binary incompatible with
> >FreeBSD 1.1.5's.  My older copy of elm refuses to work now under 2.0,
> >i get an `flock: invalid argument'.
> 
> `struct flock' starts with an off_t, so the struct is totally
> incompatible with the 1.1.5 version.

But...  Didn't the old version of flock() use a different syscall
number?  We should still be able to deal with the 32 bit off_t in
the old syscall..

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1660.789270154>