Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 06:36:29 +0300 From: "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu Subject: Re: Small syscons change Message-ID: <ATzKV5leS9@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <199501130242.UAA17971@bonkers.taronga.com>; from Peter da Silva at Thu, 12 Jan 1995 20:42:28 -0600 (CST) References: <199501130242.UAA17971@bonkers.taronga.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199501130242.UAA17971@bonkers.taronga.com> Peter da Silva
writes:
>> VT100 have very different behaviour then simple line wrap:
>No kidding. My point is that all the VAX (VMS, I assume) software he
>was complaining about was likely expecting it.
And all SCO software don't expect it :-)
We have SCO console FYI, not VT100.
Modern VT's have some escape (I don't remember it)
to switch to normal linewrap mode/VT100 linewrap mode,
I think, somebody who really need it can implement
it in this way and don't touch default normal linewrap.
--
Andrew A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ATzKV5leS9>