Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 12:30:45 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Cc: core@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg_add mimic code? Message-ID: <7091.798406245@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Apr 95 23:45:53 PDT." <199504200645.XAA12292@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Let's split by category. I'll take japanese (obviously :), I assume > Jean-Marc can take care of print. What about others? I can take some > more, but will wait for people to grab what they are interested in. I'll take editors, lang, devel and games. > That is, just rip out all the cookie stuff and the dependencies, and > change the target name from "something" to "do-something". My guess > is that that should do it for 70% of the Makefiles. I think so too - and the overall simplification we gain in those Makefiles will make it a lot easier for others to understand and improve them later. This is a win. > The remaining 25% need some things added to make it work with > accordance to the new bsd.port.mk (like the fake-pkg stuff) but these > need to be fixed anyway. > > The remaining 5% are print Makefiles so I'll let Jean-Marc worry about > them. :) Maybe you should just take the scary cases and let the ports-grunts do ALL the easy ones? This would seem to me to be a better division of effort.. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7091.798406245>