Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Apr 1995 00:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
To:        pritc003@maroon.tc.umn.edu (Mike Pritchard)
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: More devfs stuff
Message-ID:  <199504220733.AAA01174@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
In-Reply-To: <199504220716.CAA01395@mpp.com> from "Mike Pritchard" at Apr 22, 95 02:16:33 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Before I forget, it seems like people are leaning towards the
> /dev/xxx/zzz style for the DEVFS project.  I've seen quite a few
> examples that list /dev/pty/00 as the format they want (for example).
> Please, lets save us a lot of trouble down the road and make
> it /dev/pty/000.  I've been through one conversion that went from
> a 64 to a 256+ limit in this area, and I would not like 
> to do it again.  Heck, even /dev/pty/0000 isn't even really
> out of line these days.
> 
> Repeat after me:  future expansion, future expansion...

Then do it really right, and don't use leading zero's to imply an
upper limit.  Look at the current /dev/fd, it works just fine and
has no upper bounds (well, okay the minor is still a limit at what,
24 bits??).


-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                   Custom computers for FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504220733.AAA01174>