Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [EISA] related matters Message-ID: <199504231910.MAA27694@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199504231024.DAA26650@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 23, 95 03:24:53 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The present scheme of allocating devices to one of a number > of spl levels and configuring them by those queues is in my opinion, broken.. > > it would seem to me that the whole situation would be simpler > if we could simply let each device set a spl elvel individually, > and only have a single list of devices (one for ISA). It has always had me wondering why >I< had to tell config about spl-levels... What we really should have is a TEXT_SET(device_probe...) and kill config... -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504231910.MAA27694>