Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:10:18 +0300 From: Gennady Sorokopud <gena@NetVision.net.il> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, <current@freebsd.org>, <gena@NetVision.net.il> Subject: Re: no bell under Xinside server Message-ID: <XFMail.950626100804.gena@NetVision.net.il> In-Reply-To: <199506251824.UAA18975@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello!
So what do you suggest to folks that still wants to use Xinside
with syscons?
Advising things to Xinside folks sounds nice but...:-)
In message <199506251824.UAA18975@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes:
>As Bruce Evans wrote:
>>
>> It went away in revision 1.88 1995/01/12 and I think it was broken in
>> syscons before that, so nothing should have been using it.
>>
>> >+ #define CONS_XBELL _IOW('t', 123, int[2])
>>
>> Its name was CONSOLE_X_BELL in syscons and it still has that name in pcvt.
>
>Bing! Rings a bell in me.
>
>No longer supported by newer pcvt's either. It's old compatibility
>cruft from pccons, and pcvt used to implement the old pccons model for
>X11 support in order to ease the transition. We've recently decided
>that it will no longer be #ifdef'ed in by default for the next pcvt
>release (which is to be out RSN).
>
>You should advise Xinside to use
>
>#define KDMKTONE _IO('K', 8 /*, int */)
>
>instead. It's supported by both, syscons and pcvt. It's the SVRx
>compatible command, so they should have the code already handy for its
>implementation.
>
>--
>cheers, J"org
>
>joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
>Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
--------
Gennady B. Sorokopud - System programmer at NetVision Israel.
E-Mail: gena@NetVision.net.il
Homepage: http://www.netvision.net.il/~gena
This message was sent at 06/26/95 10:08:04 by XF-Mail
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.950626100804.gena>