Date: Sun, 6 Aug 95 18:30:17 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: swallace@eng.uci.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bare bones kernel Message-ID: <9508070030.AA23707@cs.weber.edu> In-Reply-To: <199508062100.OAA03760@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Aug 6, 95 02:00:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Could someone explain to me why you must have "options FFS" and > >"device npx0" in the kernel config file? Otherwise you get a linker > >error: > > >vfs_init.o: Undefined symbol `_vfs_set' referenced from text segment > > In our current design of the dynamic VFS stuff, at least *one* filesystem > is required...it doesn't matter which one. I don't consider this a bug. I'll have to think about whether this would really constitute a bug or not, and then get back to you. My gut feeling is that you should be able to run without a static file system, or at least without a vnops table pointing to a Heidemann style VFS. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9508070030.AA23707>