Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 19:35:55 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/netscape/scripts configure Message-ID: <199508220235.TAA01446@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Aug 1995 18:38:05 PDT." <199508220138.SAA04209@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Go ahead and change it. From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/netscape/scripts configure * That's because the wish port is broken. *Most* X ports go in /usr/X11R6/b >>in, * as USE_X11 defines that. Well, that's "most". :) And the wish port is not broken, it was designed that way from the beginning. Go to thud's /usr/local/bin and do a ldd then, you'll be surprised to find the number of -lX11's in there. It is impossible to clear /usr/local/bin of X ports, as so many of them are designed to install auxiliary files in /usr/local/*. To me, it makes more sense to try to put all stuff from a port in a single hierarchy. This is nothing more than a difference in opinion, so I don't think we are going to reach an agreement by further discussion. So let me say I'm going to change it unless you want to be the MAINTAINER. :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508220235.TAA01446>