Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org (Justin T. Gibbs) Cc: bugs@ns1.win.net, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changes to sup 9/05 or 9/06? Message-ID: <199509061839.LAA07763@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199509061557.IAA19478@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Sep 6, 95 08:57:46 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > >Were any changes made to sup on 9/05, 9/06? > > > >When I sup on 2.2 it starts loading the whole thing again. Was the change > >announced in early August finally put in place today or is this something > >else? > > > >Regards, > > > >Mark Hittinger > >bugs@win.net > > All of Freefall's filesystems were dumped and restored during its > upgrade to 2.1-stable. Since the ctime of all files changed, SUP > should "update" the files, not download them again. At least this > was the case for my SUP of the cvs bits. THANK YOU and whom ever helped you with doing this work, the user community may not appreciate the ``update'' of all there files but I am sure freefall is a much happier machine now that it has nice clean defragged and optimized files systems once again. Those doing work on freefall should enjoy some better responce times. And if Freefall goes faster, the developers can work faster :-). -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509061839.LAA07763>