Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:21:46 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, julian@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: why is this not a bug in namei? Message-ID: <199509182321.QAA03724@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 95 14:11:06 PDT." <199509182111.OAA08650@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Is this just a typo? Shouldn't it be a FREE() macro like below? ... >The code should still be cleaned up, however. > >I prefer the macroized version to allow later instrumentation. I prefer the non macroized version. The instrumentation of malloc/free belongs in malloc() & free(). Macros are ugly and usually evil. They unnecessarily obscure the code. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509182321.QAA03724>