Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 23:11:49 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sig 10/11 problems Message-ID: <199509220611.XAA00445@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Sep 95 22:14:26 PDT." <199509220514.WAA00765@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * Is the problem you're having with specific binaries, and does it always > * fail? I think you might have a corrupt binary and/or shared library. Except > * for a shell bug reported by Stephen Hocking, all of the reports I've gotten > * back have indicated that the patch has gotten rid off all of the sig 10/11 > * flakiness they were experiancing. > >They are all X programs, like xterm, xload, etc. When I start X, the >screen goes gray (so the server is fine), waits there for a while and >then comes back to the console with a whole bunch of messages and a >bunch of *.core files. > >This is exactly what I was seeing before. Other programs (sed and >stuff) have never failed for me. Sorry everyone...I changed the wrong 'doclusterread' in the file on freefall before I committed it. Thanks to Poul-Henning for telling me that the patch I sent him (which worked) and what I actually committed (bogus) were different! ...and thanks to Steven Wallace for trying to point out the mistake originally (you should be more assertive Steven! :-)). Okay, the _correct_ change is now committed (changing both cases of doclusterread just to be certain!)...this should be available from SUP in at about 3AM PDT. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509220611.XAA00445>