Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 21:31:44 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EXEC_DEPENDS Message-ID: <199509231931.VAA22470@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199509231200.FAA03541@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Sep 23, 95 05:00:27 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Satoshi Asami wrote: > > * This is clearly a BUILD_DEPENDS candidate. > > Yeah, it is. I just wanted the MAINTAINERs to jump in and modify the > Makefiles themselves. :) And i wanted somebody else to take over those ports where i've signed as MAINTAINER, since i'm apparently unable to work in the ports area. :^) I will yet have to see the port that will go right from the very beginning finally until the package is ready, the distfile fetchable, and the port itself entered into the parent's Makefile. :] > * Thank you! > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Or does this mean you want me to fix it? ;) Nope, the thanks were for implementing the *_DEPENDS. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509231931.VAA22470>