Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:44:32 -0800 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: pst@shockwave.com Cc: hsu@cs.hut.fi, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port of strace? Message-ID: <199511090044.QAA00337@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199511090020.QAA10452@precipice.shockwave.com> (message from Paul Traina on Wed, 08 Nov 1995 16:20:55 -0800)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Now you're misquoting me. I never said the port was a <censored>. * I said that the program itself was a <censored> <censored> <censored>. :-) Hey, that's what I meant. :) * I actually do think there are valid reasons for rejecting a port or a * program, even if we disagree on identd as a specific example. Certainly, I have been rejecting (well not exactly, I fix them the best I can and/or ask the submitters to clean them up) many ports because they are not done according to the guidelines, but I have never questioned the usefulness of the program itself.... Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511090044.QAA00337>