Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 09:10:45 +0100 (MET) From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Subject: Re: linux' mknod and named pipes. Message-ID: <199511190810.JAA21987@allegro.lemis.de> In-Reply-To: <199511190149.RAA00825@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Nov 18, 95 05:49:25 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Greenman writes: > > >I'd prefer rolling the code together and replacing mkfifo(2) with > >mkfifo(3) that calls mknod(2). POSIXism's (which is what the mkfifo(2) > > The problem I have with this is that mknod() will be going away in the > future (think devfs). The function may go away. How are you going to address the issue of portability? Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511190810.JAA21987>