Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 06:08:38 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org, julian@freefall.freebsd.org, phk@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEVFS ... Message-ID: <199512101408.GAA08938@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199512101350.AAA29501@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Dec 11, 95 00:50:12 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >All things considered, I'm in favour of the last one, but at least DEVFS > >should be added to LINT by now ? it IS in LINT now.. > > It shouldn't have been ifdefed to begin with (only commit working code, at > least when more than a couple of ifdefs would be required). > If it is ifdefed then it should be in LINT. > The ifdefs should go away when it becomes the default. DEVFS should be Ifdef'd it's an option for now.. and it can't be all in one file.. by it's nature it needs a hook in each driver.. there is no other way than to make it ifdef'd whe it is stable enough to not be an option, (actually it hasn't made me crash in months but I'm not using it that heavily..)then I'll take out the ifdefs.. > > Also not in LINT and broken by recent changes: > EXT2FS (just some missing vm declarations) > GPL_MATH_EMULATE (in LINT but commented out; fusword was missing). > > Bruce >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512101408.GAA08938>