Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 23:59:18 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..? Message-ID: <199601060659.XAA06029@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199601060555.QAA09753@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199601060555.QAA09753@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes: > >> I'd like to see a 2.1-SNAP first. We've had quite a few bug > >> fixes since 2.1-Release. > > >Hmmm. I just looked through the 206K or so of diffs between > >RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE and the RELENG_2_1_0 HEAD and I don't see > >anything there that would really merit a 2.1 SNAP though.. > > Someone should look through the diffs between RELENG_2_1_0 and HEAD to > see if 2.1++ is missing anything important. These diffs are also 206K > or so. Lines :-(. I have plans to bring in the sliplogin/slattach stuff, and I'd like to bring in both the PCMCIA code plus the ibcs2 emulation stuff as well. I'd also like to see the CVS updated after it gets used some more. I'd also like to see the new ppp code brought in, and I'd *LOVE* to get someone to help me fix the dumb ARP bug I've talked about before. However, I'm not sure what if any of the above is acceptable (actually, Jordan OK'd the sliplogin and slattach stuff, so I'll bring that in soon). Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601060659.XAA06029>