Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Feb 1996 22:54:08 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers)
Subject:   Re: And the winner is!
Message-ID:  <199602032154.WAA23224@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199602032136.OAA04374@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 3, 96 02:36:35 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Terry Lambert wrote:
> 
> > 	disklabel -Brw sdX auto
> > 	disklabel -e sdX

> What is the limiting factor on simply coding all the disk drivers to
> return either a fictitious (but always usable) geometry, or at a
> minimum, a total number of sectors for a device?

That's exactly what i'm using in the ``auto'' case.  (Or what else
did you expect?  It's still only water to cook with...)

> In keeping with the devfs discussion on the -current list, the total
> number of sectors ought to be available from both phical devices (this
> case) and logical devices (the slice/partition management case).

The slices don't (yet) return this information, that's why it's
currently limited to dedicated disks.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602032154.WAA23224>