Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Mar 1996 09:18:30 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject:   Re: COMCONSOLE: a patch and a problem
Message-ID:  <199603120818.JAA03752@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199603120407.PAA28341@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Mar 12, 96 03:07:50 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote:

> >Hmm, there was a saying the running getty on /dev/console used to be
> >totally broken.  Bruce?  Ever tried it lately?
> 
> Not lately.  I use syscons, which still has the hack of using a special
> minor device for the console so that /dev/console is a little different
> from /dev/vt0.  I think there is nothing special for pcvt, so /dev/vt0
> is the console.

...and i've been one of the guys who never had problems in running a
getty on /dev/console.  Though you've once convinced me that it was
broken for pcvt, too (i only didn't really notice).  I've never looked
again into this.

I know of some commercial (non-PC) systems that have a getty running
on /dev/console.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603120818.JAA03752>