Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:51:47 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: erich@lodgenet.com, lehey.pad@sni.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: using ddb to debug a double-panic? Message-ID: <621.826609907@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:58:15 %2B1100." <199603120458.PAA30918@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Does anybody object to > >emacs-style only, if the cursor functions work? > > Of course everyone would object :-). Mine uses wordstar style control > keys and cursor keys for editing and Turbo Debugger style function keys I still think that some standards are good, and the emacs characters have become something of a defacto standard for editing and history manipulation. I've seen the emacs bindings in everything from bash to the Motif text widget (as well as many others) and think that we should follow suit. I don't know about you guys, but ^P and ^N are now wired directly into my fingers! :-) [And FWIW, I also used to use wordstar - the color text enhancements to the original wordstar were mine, in fact] Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?621.826609907>