Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 15:18:49 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: kaleb@x.org (Kaleb S. KEITHLEY) Cc: terry@lambert.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forgiving select() call. Message-ID: <199605282218.PAA11952@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199605282135.RAA19989@exalt.x.org> from "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" at May 28, 96 05:35:53 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have a hard time believing this, since SunOS 4.x doesn't *have* a > > poll for static 4.x libc stubs linked into the program to call. > > I dunno what you're looking at. SunOS 4.1.3 has poll in libc.a and a > trivial program, statically linked on SunOS works fine on both SunOS > and Solaris, and trussing it on Solaris shows it calling poll. Ditto > for a program calling select. On my 4.1.3_U1 box: % grep select /usr/include/syscall.h #define SYS_select 93 % Looks like a system call to me. > C'mon. I don't want to know what it's probably doing. What does trussing > it on 2.3 show it doing? I've got static SunOS binaries that use select() > and syscall(SYS_select, ...) and truss shows them calling poll. Truss is wrong. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605282218.PAA11952>