Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb> To: michaelv@HeadCandy.com (Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com) Cc: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, sef@kithrup.com, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix/NT synchronization model (was: SMP progress?) Message-ID: <199606051720.KAA16854@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199606050511.WAA25213@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> from "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" at Jun 4, 96 10:11:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > Which is why I want to see how it's done in a modern Unix. Maybe > there's a "better" way. Or, at least a more "standard" way. It would > be kinda dumb to put together a bunch of sync stuff that looks like > NT, nice as it might be, when everything else written for an MP or > threaded Unix works totally different. I don't want to be locked into > an NT paradigm. SunExpert magazine did a four article series on threads beginning with the feb '96 issue. the last article in the series (may '96) compares pthreads with solaris threads. its all api level stuff jmb -- Jonathan M. Bresler FreeBSD Postmaster jmb@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD--4.4BSD Unix for PC clones, source included. http://www.freebsd.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606051720.KAA16854>