Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 07:49:36 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, erich@lodgenet.com Subject: Re: does HAVE_FPU really work? Message-ID: <199608221249.HAA04765@jake.lodgenet.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:53:37 %2B1000." <199608220753.RAA20229@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes: >>SuffFindDeps (e_acos.o) >> trying e_acos.s...not there >> trying e_acos.S...got it >> using existing source /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_acos.c >> applying .c -> .o to "e_acos.o" > >>looks like it finds e_acos.S, but uses e_acos.c anyway. > didn't find > >It shouldn't use e_acos.c, since e_acos.c isn't among the source >files if HAVE_FPU is defined (see the Makefile). > Yes, I saw that. I even put in a t: @echo ${SRCS} # make t that spit out the .S's as expected, it just didn't compile 'em. Also, when I rm'ed the .c's that corresponding had .S's `make -ds e_acos.o' resulted in: SuffFindDeps (e_acos.o) trying e_acos.s...not there trying e_acos.S...got it applying .S -> .o to "e_acos.o" SuffFindDeps (e_acos.S) cc -D_MULTI_LIBM -D_POSIX_MODE -D_IEEE_LIBM -c /src/build/msun/i387/e_acos.S -o e_acos.o It looks like make is using `e_acos' as a root, and finding `e_acos.S' and `e_acos.c', and picking `e_acos.c', regardless of what ${SRCS} is. >Bruce > still confused, eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com http://rrnet.com/~erich erich@rrnet.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608221249.HAA04765>