Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:17:45 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is there a 'loud' switch for make? Message-ID: <199608280647.QAA12796@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199608280648.IAA16220@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from "Christoph Kukulies" at Aug 28, 96 08:48:36 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christoph Kukulies stands accused of saying: > > > > > ... just trying to debug a port and being very annoyed that I can't see > > what's actually being done. Is there an opposite to the '-s' option > > to make(1) to make it loud? And is this inherited? > > -dA gives maximum verbosity. For having it inherited you may use the > variable MAKEFLAGS. OTOH I think that recursive makes inherit it > anyway - not sure though. There's loud and then there's -dA 8) I was looking for something that would tell me what commands it was executing as it went along, not drown me in debugging output 8) > --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608280647.QAA12796>