Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 20:32:27 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Adam David <adam@veda.is> Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: heads up! - /bin/rdisc to die Message-ID: <199609130332.UAA05580@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 13 Sep 1996 02:51:45 GMT." <199609130251.CAA02193@veda.is>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was mulling that over... it also means making it static ... sigh. :-( Opinions? Votes? I think the bloat of making routed static sucks less than having two programs that need maintenance, IMO. Paul From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> Subject: Re: heads up! - /bin/rdisc to die >Yup, that was my intent. > From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> > Subject: Re: heads up! - /bin/rdisc to die > When you kill rdisc, please document "-P no_rip" in /etc/sysconfig to make > routed behave as just an rdisc client. So should routed be moved from /usr/bin to /bin also at around the same time? Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609130332.UAA05580>