Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 11:21:18 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PS broke again -- what has to be rebuilt to stop this? Message-ID: <199610011821.LAA02102@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199609302032.WAA03754@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 30, 96 10:32:33 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> According to Terry Lambert: > > > everything is in /proc), and therefore a ps from kernel 0.99.x, in spirit > > > at least, will work on the latest 2.0.x kernel. > > That's only in spirit though. I've seen enough people to whom was given the > advice of upgrading to the latest "ps" (even proc-ps as opposed as > kmem-ps)... That wasn't me. My posting had to do with abstracting the interface. For the advice you suggest to be effective, the abstraction has to have been flubbed... ie: they don't have the abstraction that my posting was talking about. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610011821.LAA02102>