Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:49:38 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb> To: jhs@FreeBSD.org Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, postmaster@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ctm-cvs-cur dealta 2716 broken Message-ID: <199611270149.RAA15952@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199611252358.AAA19765@vector.jhs.no_domain> from "Julian H. Stacey" at Nov 26, 96 00:58:31 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi, Reference: > > From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb> > > Subject: Re: ctm-cvs-cur dealta 2716 broken > > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 06:24:27 -0800 (PST) > > Message-id: <199611251424.GAA20019@freefall.freebsd.org> > > > > hey, wait a minute there is a ctm-announce mailing list. > > i forgot to create an info file for the list > > > > done. thanks. > > Hi Jonathan, > > Maybe you or PHK could add to the info, where follow-up discussion should > occur ? > I recently followed up on current@ to an announcement on ctm-announce@, > ( I did this to keep ctm-announce@ a low traffic channel, but it seems > to have caused some confusion ) > If a standard follow up address was documented, I'd be glad to comply :-) well there is not a standard follow up address really. rather announcements about current should go to current. those about 2.1.x should go to stable i guess. there is always hackers and questions ;) jmb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611270149.RAA15952>