Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 09:12:08 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Mark Hannon <mark@seeware.DIALix.oz.au> Cc: kimc@w8hd.org, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X-inside memory footprint Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970120080625.9120C-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199701200932.UAA00257@putte.seeware.DIALix.oz.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for these numbers! After working with CDE on sparc/solaris, I was pretty pessimistic, but these numbers are considerably smaller than for the sparc binaries. On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Mark Hannon wrote: > >From my system, running netscape, dtmail, dtfile, dtterm etc... > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 158 root 2 0 3892K 7140K select 0:14 2.25% 2.25% Xaccel That is quite a bit bigger than my X server (nearly double). What resolution and depth? Since CDE apparently requires Xaccel, this could be a concern... > 216 mark 2 0 1836K 4228K select 0:04 0.19% 0.19% dtmail > 219 mark 18 0 632K 352K pause 0:00 1.56% 0.08% tcsh > 208 mark 2 0 1476K 3240K select 0:05 0.04% 0.04% dtwm Does dtwm typically stay around 3 megabytes, or was this shortly after starting? I ask because mwm starts out about that size, but under normal use, falls to about half that (resident size, that is). > 210 mark 2 0 564K 1744K select 0:01 0.04% 0.04% dtterm That one seems about the same as xterm. > 209 mark 2 0 1664K 3964K select 0:02 0.00% 0.00% dtfile That is about the same as the freely available moxfm which I use on occasion (dtfile has a much better interface). -john
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.970120080625.9120C-100000>