Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 15:38:51 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> Cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, scrappy@hub.org, ejs@bfd.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022338.PAA07949@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 18:34:53 EST." <199703022334.SAA00745@crh.cl.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thats not a bad idea since I have a FreeBSD-1.0 CDrom just collecting dust... Guess I have to dust it off before loading the cd into my system 8) Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > FreeBSD-1.0's gcc used to rock in terms of compilation it was at > > least twice as fast as the lastest gcc , and of course it didn't > > have any of the Pentium optimizations which may account for its > > current slowness -- well I am just giving it the benefit of the > > doubt. Someone ought to really look into what the hell is going > > on with gcc. > > So are you going to build a 1.0 binary for us? :) > > -Crh > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022338.PAA07949>