Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:33:04 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: nw1@cs.wustl.edu (Nanbor Wang) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, Hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bugs in libc_r (fwd) Message-ID: <199704030133.LAA14864@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199704021608.KAA17928@siesta.cs.wustl.edu> from Nanbor Wang at "Apr 2, 97 10:08:54 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nanbor Wang wrote: > > > Anyway we can get an update of this fix? (I don't want to get into > > > -current at this moment ;-) > > > > I've checked the libc_r source that was tagged for 2.2 and there have > > been a lot of updates to uthread files since then. Enough to prevent > > patching the 2.2 tree (despite what I said earlier 8-). Sorry. We'll > > need to be in better shape for 3.0. > > Sorry, John. What I really meant was Lite2 merge. I am using > -current before lite2 merge. (before 2/9/97 ?) Can I patch the > pthread library? Thanks. Just CVSup the libc_r tree. I doubt that there are any Lite2 issues that would get in the way. Regards, -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, 119 Cecil Street, South Melbourne Vic 3205, Australia Tel +61 3 9690 6900 Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Mob +61 418 353 137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704030133.LAA14864>