Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:29:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, nate@mt.sri.com, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95q.970412122736.6336C-100000@modem.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199704121619.AAA26303@spinner.DIALix.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Apr 1997, Peter Wemm wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > >> I like it, but can vi be built if tcl is gone? > > > > > >Just about.. :-] > > > > Can it be built to use tcl if tcl is gone at build > > time but present at run time? > > I'd rate that as "you couldn't count on it". There might be a libtcl in > the library path, and the <tcl.h> includes might still be around, but it'd > be at the risk of running into stale stuff. I presume this is what you > meant? (ie: src/contrib/tcl missing, but otherwise installed on the system) Is there some way we could all agree on the location of the tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh files, that ports could also use? That way, you could just read the relevant data from those files directly, no matter what the particular installation did. That's what those files are for ... ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 3.0 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95q.970412122736.6336C-100000>