Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:05:51 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: peter@spinner.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Cc: terry@lambert.org, black@zen.cypher.net, kory@avatar.com, brownie@earthling.net, csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? Message-ID: <199704281805.LAA02308@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199704281732.BAA21307@spinner.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Apr 29, 97 01:32:13 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > My goal would be to have incremental compiles going on in edit sessions > > so that when I was done editing, the code was read to run. I hate this > > "wait for the compile" BS. > > Hmm... marry emacs and gcc together, so that c-mode has some real > meaning.. :-) The editor/compiler could keep a nice big parse tree in > memory, being updated as you change lines. The editor could flag truely > invalid lines because the incremental parser would see it. It'd be a > "simple" matter of telling it when you wanted the output produced since > the majority of the compile is already done. > > Argh, emacs, cpp, gcc and binutils merged into a monolith.. what a horrid > thought... :-] How about using 'vi' instead? Actually, I was thinking merging cscope with a compiler would be the more useful way to do it... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704281805.LAA02308>