Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:01:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970428135905.32065b-100000@zen.cypher.net> In-Reply-To: <199704281753.KAA02242@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > >(hint: NT4 Workstation can't handle more than 2CPUs and that is the most > > > >popular commercial SMP-capable OS) > > > > > > Bullshit. > > > > > > > perhaps you'd like to clarify. NT *server* can handle more CPUs, but NT > > *workstation* is limited to 2. if you have a microsoft URL i can peruse > > to dispute that, i'd be happy to admit my mistake. but i doubt you can > > provide such a thing. > > Maybe he was disputing the claim that it's the "most popular commercial > SMP-capable OS". > > 8-) 8-). > then perhaps i should clarify. we are on a freebsd list discussing SMP x86 boards. i was referring to operating systems that run on those boards. certainly there are more Solaris/SPARC installs out there than NT, but last i checked Solaris/SPARc didn't run very well on my P6. b3n
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.970428135905.32065b-100000>