Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 12:08:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pure /proc ps? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970521120749.17872N-100000@zen.cypher.net> In-Reply-To: <199705211640.JAA03427@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
so why does ps try to access anything other than /proc when i *don't* use those options? On Wed, 21 May 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > on solaris you can chmod -s /bin/ps and users are then only able to see > > their own processes because it is all based on /proc. freebsd uses > > /dev/kmem and /dev/mem (in addition to /proc?) so that is not possible. > > > > is there any hope of a pure /proc ps on freebsd? > > % man ps > PS(1) UNIX Reference Manual PS(1) > > NAME > ps - process status > > SYNOPSIS > ps [-aCcehjlmrSTuvwx] [-M core] [-N system] [-O fmt] [-o fmt] [-p pid] > [-t tty] [-U username] [-W swap] > > Not as long as "-M core", "-N system", and "-W swap" exist to allow > running ps against system-dump images. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.970521120749.17872N-100000>