Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 20:47:57 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Named -- Specifying addresses to bind to. Message-ID: <19970524204757.02891@pavilion.net> In-Reply-To: <199705240116.KAA03569@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>; from Michael Smith on Sat, May 24, 1997 at 10:46:39AM %2B0930 References: <19970523152900.36766@pavilion.net> <199705240116.KAA03569@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 24, 1997 at 10:46:39AM +0930, Michael Smith wrote: > Josef Karthauser stands accused of saying: > > BTW. Why do I still need libc.so.2.2 on my fbsd2.2.2 machine when > > it has compiled libc.so.3.0? I've done reboot and another make world > > to try and get it to link against the newer library, but It doesn't > > want to play :(. I'd like a nice tidy system ;) > > Probably because you have ports linked against it. LibraryReport > (/usr/src/tools/lreport/LibraryReport) will scan your system and give > you a summary of shared library usage and dependancies which may shed > some light on your situation. Yep, found it. 'Twas my 'bash' shell ;) Joe -- Josef Karthauser Technical Manager Email: joe@pavilion.net Pavilion Internet plc. [Tel: +44 1273 607072 Fax: +44 1273 607073]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970524204757.02891>