Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:06:47 +0200 From: Werner Griessl <werner@btp1da.phy.uni-bayreuth.de> To: Seva Semenov <seva@anka.da.mtelecom.ru> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_msdos -- is it safe yet? Message-ID: <19970728090647.30861@btp1da.phy.uni-bayreuth.de> In-Reply-To: <199707271325.RAA27488@anka.da.mtelecom.ru>; from Seva Semenov on Sun, Jul 27, 1997 at 05:25:22PM %2B0400 References: <1431.869617688@time.cdrom.com> <199707271325.RAA27488@anka.da.mtelecom.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 27, 1997 at 05:25:22PM +0400, Seva Semenov wrote: > In article <1431.869617688@time.cdrom.com> you wrote: > >> How about LFN and VFAT32 support? (I don't have the time to do it > >> myself) > H>They're waiting for someone who actually has the time. :) > H> Jordan > Yes.. > btw.. is it safe to mount_nfs in 2.2.2-RELEASE? > I was waiting for some1 who report it, but it seems > like this only my problem. > Coz I've getted and tested 4 computers > - 486dx100/8M/Cnet en2000 > - p120/16M/3Com595 > - notebook p100/16Mb/Compex PE200 > - .... forget... something with 32Mb > and discovered something ugly. > > step 1. > get 2.2.1 or 2.2.2-RELEASE from ftp.freebsd.org. > step 2. > install it > step 3. > mount_nfs some big directory from another server > step 4 > in ttyv0 > bash$ du /nfs/ > at the same time in ttyv1 remove any big direcory by _mc_ > (no matter vertion 3.1 or 4.0) but not just "rm -r /nfs/big.dir" > > in 5-10 seconds i always getting the same result: system rebooting. > > No1 notify me that mount_nfs in RELEASES for tests only.... > > Use option "nfsv2" to make it work, unfortunately nfsv3 is the default. Werner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970728090647.30861>