Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 15:29:19 -0500 From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>, Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: de0 errors Message-ID: <19971103152919.12038@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199710280046.QAA23849@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>; from Don Lewis on Mon, Oct 27, 1997 at 04:46:03PM -0800 References: <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> <199710280046.QAA23849@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On the subject of Re: de0 errors, Don Lewis stated:
> A PCI bus analyzer could be useful if the problem is what I think it is.
> What processor and PCI chipset do you have?
This is an ALR Revolution MP-Pro system w/ 1 200Mhz PPro, 256MB Ram, 4 SCSI
Cards, a Video card, and a SMC Etherpower 10/100 Card. Its an Intel 440FX
chipset..
> > Just using FTP between two hosts on the 100mbit net I see 2-3MB/sec and
> > receive at about half that.
>
> That's not very impressive. To eliminate the influence of disk I/O, you
> might want to test network throughput using ttcp or something similar. I'd
> recommend using ping to check for packet loss at the same time. You
> shouldn't see any packet loss if you're sending between two machines on the
> same network segment.
>
Humm, tcpblast shows 4.0MB/sec. Granted this isnt an empty net either, fairly
busy I would imagine.
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971103152919.12038>