Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 9 Nov 1997 03:46:31 -0600 (CST)
From:      Jim Bryant <jbryant@unix.tfs.net>
To:        tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jamesbryant@sprintmail.com
Subject:   Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal)
Message-ID:  <199711090946.DAA05798@argus.tfs.net>
In-Reply-To: <199711090823.BAA18550@usr06.primenet.com> from Terry Lambert at "Nov 9, 97 08:23:22 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply:
> > For Windows users this bug should not be much of a problem unless viruses
> > start popping up taking advantage of the bug.  For FreeBSD it is not very
> > comforting to know that any misbehaving user can lock up your shell
> > machine, but in a controlled environment this should not be a problem.
> 
> A virus isn't the only way it could be done.

the list of ways this could be used is too long to enumerate...

> A Windows user's ISP could be denial of service attacked using the bug,
> so it could affect them.
> 
> Active X, anyone?
> 
> Microsoft made their JAVA capable of calling x86 code (makes it possible
> to write java wrappers for ActiveX code that isn't security checked for
> a VeriSign key, right?).  Apparent;y Sun was right about it being a
> mistake for Microsoft to do this.  8-) 8-).

bill gets bit on the butt again...  every security expert in the
industry tells bill he's stupid, but does he listen...  we are talking
about a man who wants to bypass the standards process rather than be a
part of it...
 
> Word Macros?  Excel Macros?  Help files?  Email attachments?  Screen
> savers?  Desktop Themes?
> 
> 
> The default for the system directory on Windows NT is world writeable;
> it seems to me many NT file servers are at risk (not that they weren't
> at risk without tuning anyway).  I'd say "all", but of course NT runs
> on non-Intel machines... ;-).
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ heheh, barely, AXP, MIPS, cases in point....

scary stuff, eh...

RECALL  RECALL  RECALL  [as in TOTAL RECALL]

i don't know why i didn't mention this in my earlier post with the
disassembly info:

could it be possible that intel is lying about finding out about this
on friday...

a pentium specific instuction, compatable with the LOCK prefix, but
not tested...  a pentium specific instruction to compare and exchange
a set of quadword values IN 10 CLOCKS, but not tested...

of all of the instructions specific to pentium and above classes of
processors, this is one i would consider highly desirable to use, and
thus should be one of the most extensively tested.  once 486 backward
compatability is tossed out the door, this will be an extensively used
instruction.

for a full description of the instruction, please see pp. 25-72 and
25-73 of intel's "Pentium Processor Family Developer's Manual, Volume 3:
Archetecture and Programming Manual".

this reeks.

can you say coverup?

do i recall reading on this list that ppro or p-ii cpus generate an
exception on this?  this would indicate quite probably that they found
out about this LONG before friday.  if my hunch is correct, i hope
this bites them on the butt.

i don't know about you, but i bought a cpu that would "RUN TOMORROW'S
SOFTWARE TODAY".

i don't buy intel's ass-covering story that they just learned about
this...

RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL
RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL   RECALL

jim
-- 
All opinions expressed are mine, if you    |  "I will not be pushed, stamped,
think otherwise, then go jump into turbid  |  briefed, debriefed, indexed, or
radioactive waters and yell WAHOO !!!      |  numbered!" - #1, "The Prisoner"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inet: jbryant@tfs.net    AX.25: kc5vdj@wv0t.#neks.ks.usa.noam     grid: EM28pw
voice: KC5VDJ - 6 & 2 Meters AM/FM/SSB, 70cm FM.   http://www.tfs.net/~jbryant
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HF/6M/2M: IC-706-MkII, 2M: HTX-212, 2M: HTX-202, 70cm: HTX-404, Packet: KPC-3+



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711090946.DAA05798>