Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:18:59 EST
From:      wakkym@juno.com (Lee Cremeans)
To:        tlambert@primenet.com
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Internal modem suckage (was: close() on a modem taking a long time?)
Message-ID:  <19971219.001640.5295.0.wakkym@juno.com>
References:  <199712190353.UAA02805@usr01.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[diverging from the topic at hand...redirected to -chat]

On Fri, 19 Dec 1997 03:53:01 +0000 (GMT) Terry Lambert
<tlambert@primenet.com> writes:

>
>If the modem is internal, well, then you get what you deserve 
>(internal
>modems suck).

Well, to be honest, internal modems were (and I stress "were") fine for
casual use in BSD up until recently. A lot of the internals these days
are Plug-and-Play, or UART-less, or (fear and loathing time) BOTH. The
USR WinModems are perfect examples of this; the things should burn in
hell as far as I'm concerned... :P At least with some PnP modems, they
have real UARTs on board, and you can at least USE them after you get the
PnP  configured--not so with WInModems. If I get another modem, it'll
most likely be an external, and not until 56K is standardised...Im
currently running on a 1995-vintage Cardinal/Rockwell 28.8, one that
actually has jumpers on it (FreeBSD loves it).





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971219.001640.5295.0.wakkym>