Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 08:03:17 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980120075653.22622A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801192349.CAA01277@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > This is a real example of CVS generated diff, until you fixed CVS. File > index.cpp doesn't exists in the current directory, but it *exists* in the > So, please don't say that old GNU patch always ignored Index: line, and there > is no difference. It is simple don't true. I have already tried, as you > requested. You can try too. Don't be lazy! My answer about equal treating was answer on particual question of Index: precedance handling with right result assumed (i.e. patching right file in case we have directory tree). It is wrong result that is different, but right result is one; since people interested in right result I talk about this clause strictly. For all possible nits see patch(1) and patch source, but it is outside this discussion subject. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980120075653.22622A-100000>