Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Feb 1998 22:27:19 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        David Kelly <dkelly@HiWAAY.net>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: why must POP clients have a resolvable IP ? what about dynamic IPs ? 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980204222658.16875O-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199802050108.TAA06403@nospam.hiwaay.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, David Kelly wrote:

> > I'm sure we've all seen this error message before :
> > 
> > >> popper[14612]: (v2.2) Unable to get canonical name of client, err = 0  
> > 
> > And checking the archives again, the explanation is :
> > 
> > [snip]
> > "This means it can't get the domain name of the IP that is using popper.
> > Try doing a nslookup on the IP, if it fails that is the reason."
> > "You need to put the IP address of your client in the named or hosts."
> > [/snip]
> 
> My employer refuses to make entries in their DNS server for internal 
> machines which are not visible to the outside world.

Then why not point the Irix box at a real nameserver outside the net?  Or
is that blocked?

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980204222658.16875O-100000>