Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 07:53:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: joelh@gnu.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel support for memory semaphores/locks... Message-ID: <199804081153.HAA02444@hda.hda.com> In-Reply-To: <199804072257.RAA26476@detlev.UUCP> from Joel Ray Holveck at "Apr 7, 98 05:57:15 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> No, you'd go to sleep for a jiffy and check again... I belive a > >> yield() syscall is in the pipeline or maybe already in. > > Yield is in the kernel. > > Is yield() the same as sleep(0)? No, in that the behavior is standard. "man sched_yield" on current. At least for now you need: options "P1003_1B" options "_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING" Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Safety critical systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804081153.HAA02444>