Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 16:20:31 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The true meaning of NT Message-ID: <19980502162031.33640@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <19980502155300.A17115@klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Sat, May 02, 1998 at 03:53:00PM %2B0200 References: <199805011408.HAA14370@freefall.freebsd.org> <19980502141108.A13749@klemm.gtn.com> <354f1e1b.93151734@mail.cetlink.net> <19980502155300.A17115@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 03:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 01:24:42PM +0000, John Kelly wrote: > > On Sat, 2 May 1998 14:11:08 +0200, Andreas Klemm > > <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> wrote: > > > > >"NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) > > > > NT = Net Trash (John Kelly) > > Never Tolerable > Never Trusted > No Technology > > ;-) "NT - where multiplying the code size by 6 is considered a 'bugfix release'" We really trust them not to introduce bugs and security problems in that 5x more code. Truly. Microsoft has never had a serious bug. Eivind, who'd feel he was a liar if he said anything else. Hey, Win95 worked on that machine yesterday until he did half a FreeBSD boot (to see a HD probe), so it must be FreeBSD's fault, right? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980502162031.33640>