Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 21:47:42 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, stefan@promo.de (Stefan Bethke), luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ISA-PnP w\o BIOS support? Message-ID: <199805070347.VAA07836@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199805070237.TAA00458@antipodes.cdrom.com> References: <199805070138.LAA15738@cain.gsoft.com.au> <199805070237.TAA00458@antipodes.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Things is, this falls really short for non-ISA/non-PnP devices as well. > > > Think hot-swappable devices, and devices that *really* no one knows > > > about? Also, devices that can use IRQ's, but don't necessarily need > > > them. How do you say 'go ahead and use it', vs. 'don't bother'. > > It's also not very useful for devices which use multiple IRQs, and ports etc.. > > port0 .. port1 .. would be useful for that.. > > Please folks; read the relevant PnP documents Pleas Mike, read what was said. for non-ISA/non-PnP devices, reading the PnP docs is a waste of time. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805070347.VAA07836>