Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 17:09:12 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>, Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel vs the rest (was `Original PC' and `talk') Message-ID: <199805220009.RAA05779@antipodes.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 22 May 1998 09:57:15 %2B0930." <19980522095715.R27201@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> complexity). (The downside is that a unified cache will adjust to > >> different code vs data footprints - giving somewhat better hit rates > >> for a given total cache size). > > > > I have both. > > > > Data cache size: 16 Kbytes > > Instruction cache size: 16 Kbytes > > Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 512 Kbytes on Processor 0 > > > > All hail high end workstation makers. This is the SGI on my desk, lowly > > Indy that it is. > > And how large is the TLB? And the page size? Now, now, Greg. Everyone knows it's better to handle the TLB in software. 8) -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805220009.RAA05779>