Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 00:27:38 +0900 From: SANETO Takanori <sanewo@ba2.so-net.ne.jp> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top -osize Message-ID: <199805311527.AAA00170@sanewo.ba2.so-net.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu's message of Sun, 31 May 1998 10:53:51 -0400. <199805311453.KAA18088@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199805311453.KAA18088@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> said: ><<On 31 May 1998 19:55:28 +0900, Takanori Saneto <sanewo@ba2.so-net.ne.jp> said: > >> int >> -proc_compare(pp1, pp2) >> +compare_cpu(pp1, pp2) > >> struct proc **pp1; >> struct proc **pp2; > >qsort(3) comparison functions take arguments of type `const void *', >not `struct proc **'. Yes, you are right. My patch does not change the way comparison functions being (not) prototyped. In contrib/top/top.c: >#ifdef ORDER >extern int (*proc_compares[])(); >#else >extern int proc_compare(); >#endif Is it time to create a patch to make them prototyped and send it to the maintainer of ``top''? -- さねを <URL:mailto:sanewo@ba2.so-net.ne.jp> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805311527.AAA00170>