Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 09:16:32 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, nirva@ishiboo.com, rhh@ct.picker.com, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Remote device multiplexing Message-ID: <199806062316.JAA02930@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199806062308.QAA11624@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Jun 6, 98 04:08:58 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Amancio Hasty wrote: > My take is that our pthread package can not handle recursive > pthread exits. I tried getting around this by adding a > an exit_flag to the thread structure and fixing the access lock > on the key table by relesing the lock before calling > the destructor however we get stuck somewhere else now: I think that the destructor needs to be called with the key entry unlocked (as you mentioned in mail yesterday). I am seeing this problem in one of my other tests - at least that's what I think it is. > I think is easier if the ACE group prevents the stupid recursive exit > call. I disagree. I think it is the only mechanism they have available to them other than "rm -rf $ACE_ROOT". 8-) Best not to send them mail just yet. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806062316.JAA02930>