Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jun 1998 18:27:22 +0930 (CST)
From:      Michael Gratton <mike@vee.net>
To:        Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Enlightenment (was:Re: A contest about to start...)
Message-ID:  <XFMail.980616182722.mike@vee.net>
In-Reply-To: <199806160650.XAA17422@rah.star-gate.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16-Jun-98 Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> Enlightenment runs fine on 3.0 -currrent , I use it all the time
> on my test box cioloco and it does not seem to use that much
> cpu time.

How stable is 3.0 -current right now? The system I use is a production system -
it must be up and stable pretty much all the time.

Is it difficult to upgrade from 2.2.6 -stable to 3.0 -current? Is it worth
it?

/Mike.

* Mike Gratton - mike@vee.net
!   "I'd rather be anywhere doing anything"
$ http://www.vee.net/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.980616182722.mike>